In Australia, the practice of imposing surcharges on payments has become a contentious issue, especially when applied to both cash and card transactions. A notable incident involved a restaurant on Victoria’s Great Ocean Road, where a traveler in Lorne observed a 3% surcharge regardless of payment method. Additionally, the establishment charged a 10% surcharge on weekends and 20% on public holidays.
Read More: Millions of Australians May Extend Home Loan Terms to Manage Costs
Professor Steve Worthington from Swinburne University criticized such practices, particularly the surcharge on cash payments, labeling them as “very poor practice.” He argued that costs associated with handling cash should be integrated into the base prices of goods and services, similar to other operational expenses. Worthington emphasized that surcharges based on payment methods raise ethical concerns, as they prevent customers from knowing the true cost of an item until the point of payment.
Legally, Australian businesses are permitted to pass on the exact cost incurred for processing specific payment types to consumers. For instance, if a card payment system charges a business a 1% fee per transaction, the business can impose a 1% surcharge on customers using that payment method. However, a 3% surcharge on card payments exceeds the typical range of 0.5% to 2% observed in many businesses and may violate regulations set by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC).
The ACCC mandates that businesses must not charge more than the actual cost of accepting a payment method. Furthermore, if a business imposes surcharges on all payment types, it must include these charges in the displayed prices to ensure transparency. The Australian Banking Association (ABA) also notes that while businesses can levy surcharges to cover costs associated with cash handling, they must be able to substantiate these costs to prevent excessive or unjustified fees.
The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) is currently reviewing the surcharging framework to determine its relevance in the evolving payment landscape. This review aims to address concerns about opaque and inconsistent surcharging practices that may lead to consumer confusion and potential overcharging. As the RBA considers potential reforms, there is an ongoing debate about the necessity and fairness of surcharges, especially as Australia moves towards a more cashless society.
Read More:- Domino’s Reports First Loss in Two Decades Amid Store Closures
In summary, while surcharges are legally permissible to cover the costs of specific payment methods, imposing them on both cash and card payments, especially without clear justification, raises ethical and legal questions. Transparency and adherence to regulatory guidelines are essential to maintain consumer trust and ensure fair trading practices.
